The April 24, 2026 deadline for state and local government websites to comply with WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards has arrived. If your agency's website didn't make it โ you're not alone, but you need to act now.
We scanned government websites across the country in the days leading up to the deadline. The findings are sobering: a significant portion of state and city government websites still have detectable WCAG violations. Here's what the enforcement landscape looks like, and what to do next.
See how 321 websites scored →
View the 2026 ReportThe Americans with Disabilities Act gives the Department of Justice authority to investigate complaints, initiate compliance reviews, and take enforcement action. Now that the Title II deadline has passed, here's the enforcement pathway:
We ran automated WCAG 2.1 AA scans on state government portals and major US city websites on April 24, 2026. Here are the findings:
| State | WCAG Violations | Critical | Serious | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | 8 | 2 | 1 | โ ๏ธ High risk |
| Rhode Island | 8 | 0 | 4 | โ ๏ธ High risk |
| Alaska | 7 | 0 | 3 | โ ๏ธ Elevated risk |
| Arizona | 6 | 0 | 4 | โ ๏ธ Elevated risk |
| Colorado | 3 | 0 | 1 | โ ๏ธ Moderate risk |
| Texas | 2 | 0 | 0 | โ ๏ธ Low risk |
| Florida | 2 | 0 | 1 | โ ๏ธ Low risk |
| Illinois | 0 | โ | โ | โ Compliant |
| Massachusetts | 0 | โ | โ | โ Compliant |
| City | Violations | Score | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Beach, CA | 9 | 0/100 | 4 |
| Kansas City, MO | 8 | 16/100 | 2 |
| Aurora, CO | 8 | 39/100 | 1 |
| Washington, DC | 5 | 55/100 | 1 |
| San Jose, CA | 5 | 60/100 | 0 |
| Atlanta, GA | 4 | 75/100 | 0 |
| Columbus, OH | 0 | 100/100 | 0 |
| Tucson, AZ | 0 | 100/100 | 0 |
Scans performed with Accessalyze (powered by axe-core, the same engine used by Google Chrome DevTools and Microsoft). Automated scanning detects approximately 40% of WCAG violations โ full compliance requires manual review.
These are the WCAG violations appearing most frequently across government sites right now:
If your government website has unresolved violations, here's the recommended response playbook:
Run a comprehensive scan to understand the scope of your violations. Accessalyze provides a free single-page scan with violation counts, descriptions, and affected elements โ no signup required.
If a complaint is filed, agencies that can demonstrate active, good-faith remediation efforts are in a significantly stronger position. Start a remediation log immediately โ record what you're fixing and when.
Not all violations carry equal enforcement weight. Critical violations (missing alt text on images that convey information, missing form labels, unlabeled interactive elements) are most likely to affect disabled users and generate complaints. Fix these first.
Accessalyze Pro ($49/mo) provides exact HTML, CSS, and ARIA fix code for every detected violation โ reducing the time from scan to fix from days to hours. Pro also includes full-site crawl (up to 50 pages) so you see the complete picture.
Compliance isn't a one-time event. Content updates, CMS changes, and third-party widget updates can re-introduce violations. Weekly automated monitoring catches regressions before they become complaints.
Scan your government website now โ free, no signup required. See your WCAG violations and compliance score in 30 seconds.
Scan Your Site Free โPro plans include AI fix code, full-site crawl, and weekly monitoring
Automated tools like Accessalyze catch approximately 40% of WCAG violations. The other 60% require human judgment โ things like whether an image alt text accurately conveys meaning, whether a complex chart is understandable without the chart, or whether interactive widgets are usable by someone with only a keyboard.
For full ADA compliance, agencies should combine automated scanning (to catch systematic, detectable violations quickly) with periodic manual expert review. Several accessibility consultancies offer government-focused VPAT audits and remediation support.
The agencies that achieved compliance before the deadline typically took a multi-phase approach:
Enforcement risk correlates with violation severity and impact. A few moderate violations (like minor landmark issues) are lower risk than critical violations that prevent screen reader users from accessing core government services. That said, any unresolved violation is a liability โ remediate as quickly as possible.
Yes. An accessibility statement that acknowledges known issues and commits to a remediation timeline demonstrates good faith. It won't prevent enforcement if violations are serious, but it's a positive signal during any DOJ review.
Yes. Government agencies are responsible for the accessibility of their websites regardless of the technology stack. Vendors may share responsibility depending on contract terms, but the agency's legal obligation under ADA Title II does not transfer to vendors.
Settlement agreements vary, but DOJ typically sets remediation timelines of 6-18 months depending on the scope of violations. Agencies that self-initiate remediation before complaints are filed have more control over the timeline.
About Accessalyze: Accessalyze is a free WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility scanner built by Genesis AI Services. It uses axe-core (the same engine as Google Chrome DevTools) to detect accessibility violations and provides AI-generated fix code. Designed specifically for government and enterprise teams facing ADA compliance requirements.
โ Back to Accessalyze ยท More Accessibility Resources
See real website accessibility scores: Browse 244+ free accessibility audits โ
Try it yourself
Enter your website URL to get a free accessibility score.